Historical Portfolio Data
PortfolioMENU
Historical Chart of Total Assets
This graph can be scrolled sideways.
Total Assets
Properties
(billion yen)
This table can be scrolled sideways.
Fiscal Period
Ended
|
Total Assets | Number of Existing Properties |
Acquisition Price |
Total Appraisal Value (I) |
Total Book Value (II) |
Difference (I-II) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb. 2022 (40th) | 1,247,439 | 128 | 1,211,319 | 1,309,105 | 1,156,289 | 152,815 |
Aug. 2021 (39th) | 1,235,720 | 126 | 1,173,761 | 1,280,820 | 1,119,816 | 161,003 |
Feb. 2021 (38th) | 903,221 | 102 | 880,472 | 987,330 | 824,751 | 162,579 |
Aug. 2020 (37th) | 903,461 | 102 | 888,884 | 997,160 | 836,003 | 161,157 |
Feb. 2020 (36th) | 899,888 | 100 | 877,288 | 988,190 | 826,061 | 162,129 |
Aug. 2019 (35th) | 900,799 | 100 | 883,234 | 994,120 | 832,643 | 161,477 |
Feb. 2019 (34th) | 897,331 | 101 | 905,735 | 1,008,340 | 851,358 | 156,982 |
Aug. 2018 (33rd) | 887,668 | 98 | 888,675 | 985,230 | 836,065 | 149,165 |
Feb. 2018 (32nd) | 902,191 | 100 | 910,110 | 994,230 | 859,041 | 135,189 |
Aug. 2017 (31st) | 897,631 | 95 | 880,210 | 959,530 | 832,354 | 127,176 |
Feb. 2017 (30th) | 856,627 | 92 | 847,281 | 916,540 | 801,896 | 114,644 |
Aug. 2016 (29th) | 858,390 | 93 | 848,515 | 907,284 | 803,637 | 103,647 |
Feb. 2016 (28th) | 829,239 | 94 | 852,414 | 898,682 | 807,141 | 91,541 |
Aug. 2015 (27th) | 842,568 | 90 | 854,133 | 874,015 | 803,103 | 70,912 |
Feb. 2015 (26th) | 834,687 | 88 | 845,646 | 847,609 | 796,765 | 50,844 |
Aug. 2014 (25th) | 785,442 | 84 | 802,395 | 792,437 | 755,736 | 36,701 |
Feb. 2014 (24th) | 777,706 | 81 | 787,686 | 769,357 | 742,642 | 26,715 |
Aug. 2013 (23rd) | 711,352 | 76 | 720,396 | 685,097 | 678,711 | 6,386 |
Feb. 2013 (22nd) | 710,212 | 76 | 720,018 | 677,920 | 681,823 | -3,903 |
Aug. 2012 (21st) | 657,027 | 70 | 667,618 | 621,840 | 633,322 | -11,482 |
Feb. 2012 (20th) | 659,346 | 70 | 664,118 | 614,545 | 634,149 | -19,604 |
Aug. 2011 (19th) | 621,377 | 59 | 624,254 | 566,765 | 597,570 | -30,805 |
Feb. 2011 (18th) | 625,312 | 59 | 624,254 | 568,969 | 601,341 | -32,372 |
Aug. 2010 (17th) | 666,843 | 59 | 624,254 | 565,952 | 605,601 | -39,649 |
Feb. 2010 (16th) | 578,829 | 50 | 571,229 | 512,641 | 554,789 | -42,148 |
Aug. 2009 (15th) | 588,500 | 50 | 571,107 | 517,981 | 559,203 | -41222 |
Feb. 2009 (14th) | 578,674 | 48 | 561,927 | 537,350 | 553,619 | -16,269 |
Aug. 2008 (13th) | 589,630 | 49 | 569,414 | 605,542 | 564,703 | 40,839 |
Feb. 2008 (12th) | 546,831 | 45 | 526,133 | 591,804 | 524,136 | 67,668 |
Aug. 2007 (11th) | 488,747 | 42 | 455,243 | 509,570 | 454,711 | 54,859 |
Feb. 2007 (10th) | 480,415 | 41 | 448,490 | 498,547 | 449,981 | 48,566 |
Aug. 2006 (9th) | 394,376 | 37 | 369,891 | 411,209 | 372,469 | 38,740 |
Feb. 2006 (8th) | 339,844 | 34 | 308,307 | 332,307 | 310,547 | 21,760 |
Aug. 2005 (7th) | 312,349 | 32 | 291,215 | 306,163 | 293,836 | 12,327 |
Feb. 2005 (6th) | 244,706 | 24 | 228,307 | 231,265 | 230,610 | 655 |
Aug. 2004 (5th) | 200,686 | 20 | 186,175 | 188,750 | 188,280 | 470 |
Feb. 2004 (4th) | 169,891 | 16 | 156,555 | 159,280 | 159,024 | 256 |
Aug. 2003 (3rd) | 126,377 | 10 | 112,438 | 114,900 | 113,933 | 967 |
Feb. 2003 (2nd) | 45,012 | 4 | 42,891 | 43,220 | 43,027 | 193 |
Aug. 2002 (1st) | 44,064 | 4 | 40,917 | 41,107 | 41,314 | -207 |
* Amounts in millions of yen, except for number of existing properties. The difference between the total appraisal value and total book value is calculated by simple subtraction in millions.
Occupancy Ratio
This table can be scrolled sideways.
Fiscal Period
Ended
|
Leasable Area (m²) | Number of Tenants *1 |
Occupancy Ratio (%) *2 |
NOI Yield (%) |
NOI yield after depreciation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb. 2022 (40th) | 2,533,147.83 | 1,566 | 98.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Aug. 2021 (39th) | 2,506,060.21 | 1,435 | 99.1 | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Feb. 2021 (38th) | 2,336,226.77 | 968 | 99.6 | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Aug. 2020 (37th) | 2,336,391.47 | 984 | 99.7 | 4.7 | 3.4 |
Feb. 2020 (36th) | 2,397,265.59 | 938 | 99.7 | 4.8 | 3.6 |
Aug. 2019 (35th) | 2,397,039.17 | 923 | 99.1 | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Feb. 2019 (34th) | 2,457,897.95 | 958 | 98.8 | 4.8 | 3.6 |
Aug. 2018 (33rd) | 2,442,275.77 | 960 | 98.6 | 4.9 | 3.7 |
Feb. 2018 (32nd) | 2,602,978.71 | 962 | 99.5 | 5.2 | 3.9 |
Aug. 2017 (31st) | 2,566,901.5 | 975 | 99.7 | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Feb. 2017 (30th) | 2,563,897.2 | 937 | 99.6 | 5 | 3.7 |
Aug. 2016 (29th) | 2,668,210.09 | 880 | 99.4 | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Feb. 2016 (28th) | 2,842,989.82 | 1007 | 99.7 | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Aug. 2015 (27th) | 3,150,204.42 | 961 | 99.4 | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Feb. 2015 (26th) | 3,144,932.25 | 1040 | 99.8 | 5.2 | 3.8 |
Aug. 2014 (25th) | 3,067,166.11 | 1037 | 99.9 | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Feb. 2014 (24th) | 3,095,171.83 | 1021 | 99.9 | 5.3 | 3.8 |
Aug. 2013 (23rd) | 3,000,346.25 | 908 | 99.8 | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Feb. 2013 (22nd) | 3,000,501.52 | 917 | 99.8 | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Aug. 2012 (21st) | 2,936,032.24 | 879 | 99.8 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Feb. 2012 (20th) | 2,936,425.28 | 868 | 99.8 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Aug. 2011 (19th) | 2,717,104.48 | 576 | 99.6 | 5 | 3.4 |
Feb. 2011 (18th) | 2,717,223.91 | 530 | 99.1 | 5.1 | 3.4 |
Aug. 2010 (17th) | 2,759,561.15 | 523 | 99.6 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Feb. 2010 (16th) | 2,530,352.95 | 478 | 99.5 | 5.1 | 3.4 |
Aug. 2009 (15th) | 2,531,279.32 | 410 | 99.7 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Feb. 2009 (14th) | 2,525,167.01 | 373 | 99.7 | 5.3 | 3.6 |
Aug. 2008 (13th) | 2,625,613.98 | 413 | 99.9 | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Feb. 2008 (12th) | 2,427,216.15 | 414 | 99.9 | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Aug. 2007 (11th) | 2,197,725.11 | 390 | 99.8 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Feb. 2007 (10th) | 2,143,327.66 | 415 | 99.9 | 5.4 | 3.8 |
Aug. 2006 (9th) | 1,775,668.16 | 414 | 99.9 | 5.6 | 4 |
Feb. 2006 (8th) | 1,492,366.57 | 409 | 99.9 | 5.9 | 4.3 |
Aug. 2005 (7th) | 1,405,196.55 | 347 | 99.6 | 5.8 | 4.2 |
Feb. 2005 (6th) | 996,847.31 | 305 | 99.9 | 5.7 | 4.2 |
Aug. 2004 (5th) | 818,436.38 | 308 | 99.9 | 6.2 | 4.6 |
Feb. 2004 (4th) | 721,947.76 | 283 | 99.9 | 5.9 | 4.5 |
Aug. 2003 (3rd) | 410,449.27 | 255 | 99.4 | 6.9 | 5.4 |
Feb. 2003 (2nd) | 180,459.4 | 5 | 100 | 6.6 | 5.2 |
Aug. 2002 (1st) | 180,459.4 | 5 | 100 | 6.8 | 5.3 |
*1 The number of tenants is based on end tenants.
*2 The occupancy ratio is calculated by simple average method.
*2 The occupancy ratio is calculated by simple average method.
Sales Performance of Portfolio Total
This graph can be scrolled sideways.
*1 Portfolio total is based on interview by asset management company (excluding tax)
*2 Current Survey of Commerce by METI is based on total sales value (existing stores) of Department stores and GMS on year-on-year basis (including tax)
*3 The figures for 2021 are larger because the comparison data for the same month of 2020 includes facilities that were closed.
*4 In April 2021, portfolio total is 882.9% compared to the same month of 2020.
*5 In May 2021, portfolio total is 16,505.2% compared to the same month of 2020.